01Hotel Investment & Feasibility

From Car Park to Hotel: London Conversion Feasibility

Academic Feasibility Case Study — MSc Strategic Hotel Management

Should this London asset become a hotel?

100

proposed keys, Zone 1 London

Tower Bridge and the City of London — the corridor the site sits within

60-second analyst brief

Full analysisSix parts

Context & Question

The situation, and the decision it demanded.

“Could a central London car park sustain a 100-key upper-midscale hotel — and under what ownership structure?”

A non-operating investor held the Q-Park Tower Bridge car park — unbuilt potential in a supply-constrained London Bridge corridor. The question was not architectural but commercial: what hotel, if any, could this site realistically support?

Approach

How the problem was worked.

Market first, product second, numbers last. The analysis moved through five stages — site, market, positioning, performance, decision — so the concept was shaped by evidence rather than preference.

London street context near the site
Site context — illustrative
Upper-midscale select-service hotel interior
Select-service concept — illustrative

Interactive Analysis

The evidence — investigate it.

  • Location and demand-generator mapping across business, leisure, transport and events
  • Competitor set benchmarking — occupancy, ADR and price-value position
  • Concept and brand positioning for a 100-key select-service product
  • HMA vs franchise structures — control, distribution and cost trade-offs
  • Five-year projections: ADR, occupancy, RevPAR and GOP, base and downside
  • Sensitivity analysis on the assumptions the investment case depended on most

What could this asset become?

A surface car park minutes from Tower Bridge: unbuilt potential in a supply-constrained corridor. The site analysis weighed plot capacity, access, visibility — and the scarcity of new select-service supply nearby.

Zone 1 location100-key capacityNon-operating investor

Existing asset

Surface car park

Proposed

100-key hotel

Investor

Non-operating

01 / 05

Insight

What the evidence revealed.

“London demand is deep but not forgiving. The comp set rewards distribution strength and cost discipline — a branded select-service product held a defensible position where heavier concepts would not.”

Recommendation

What should happen, and why.

Proceed as a branded upper-midscale select-service conversion

Structure as franchise-style — brand distribution without a heavy HMA

Underwrite on conservative, sensitivity-tested occupancy and ADR

What This Demonstrates

The capabilities behind the case.

Market AnalysisConcept DevelopmentHotel EconomicsInvestment Thinking

Feasibility connects market evidence, product positioning, operating assumptions and financial performance into one investment decision.

If I took this analysis further…

Validate conversion CAPEX and buildability

Test additional operator and brand structures

Extend downside scenario analysis